Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Pembelton v. Roden et al
as 3:2026cv01556
Plaintiff:
David Pembelton, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Scotty Roden, Deputy Medlock and Trainee Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chris O'Connell et al v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv01291
Defendant:
Kia Corporation, Kia America, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,
Plaintiff:
Christopher O'Connell, Michael Roden, Renee Sevor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Valdez et al v. WSH 71 TX Owner, LP et al
as 1:2026cv00681
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Valdez and Carina Urbina Padilla
Defendant:
WSH 71 TX Owner, LP, Cortland Management, LLC, Mark Roden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Roden, Jr. v. Reamer et al
as 5:2026cv00054
Defendant:
Elaine Michelle Reamer and County of Guadalupe, Texas
Plaintiff:
James Louis Roden, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roden, Sr. v. Reamer et al
as 5:2026cv00081
Defendant:
Elaine Michelle Reamer and County of Guadalupe, Texas
Plaintiff:
James Louis Roden, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roden v. Bisignano
as 0:2025cv04504
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Roden
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Roden v. Hayes et al
as 5:2025cv00197
Plaintiff:
Drew Roden
Defendant:
Jailer Athena Hayes and Elizabeth Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weinert v. Pushmataha County Municipal District, et al
as 25-7075
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ALEXANDER WEINERT
Defendant:
PUSHMATAHA COUNTY MUNICIPAL DISTRICT, B.J. HEDGECOCK and AMANDA RODEN
Aldrich et al v. AGC Chemicals Americas Inc et al
as 2:2025cv12304
Plaintiff:
James Aldrich, Alma Arenas, Donna Marie Arevalo and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
