Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Bell v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01390
Plaintiff:
Carter B. Bell
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bells v. NDA, et al.
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORVILLE USP CORRECTIONS NDA, SHINN, MCCOLLOUGH and others
Bell, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Larry B. Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Ransom et al
as 1:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
John Taylor
Defendant:
Kevin Ransom, J. Eyer, Dr. Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant:
JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. Groves, et al
as 22-55513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
GROVES, Correction Officer and JOHN DOES
Defendant:
SMITH, Correction Officer and FLOREZ
Bell v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Karen B. Bell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. Groves, et al
as 21-56202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
GROVES, Correction Officer and JOHN DOES
Defendant:
SMITH, Correction Officer and FLOREZ
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. C. Rivers, et al
as 21-1882
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN ASH, Doctor, C. RIVERS, MS. NELSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Wedgeworth v. Garrett et al
as 7:2020cv01217
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, P Bradley, B Bell and others
Petitioner:
Tiffany Wedgeworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
