Cases 31 - 40 of 218
Phillip Killgore v. City of South El Monte, et al
as 20-55666
Defendant / Appellee:
T. HARRIS, N. TARIO, C. PRESTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP KILLGORE, DBA Lavender Massage
HALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65044
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID B HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28430
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HALL and JAMES B HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Campbell v. Hollie Bennett
as 19-2149
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. CATHERINE A. STONE, MR. CHARLTON B. HALL, MR. DEAN GRIGG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. CAMPBELL
Robert B. Hall v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv08973
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Hall
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., GHG Corporation and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Meyers v. J. Bentley
as 19-6917
Defendant / Appellee:
FL. OFFICER LEWIS, HENRY PONTON, SERGEANT MEADE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Crawley v. Kanode et al
as 7:2019cv00474
Defendant:
B. Kanode, Redmond, Horton and others
Plaintiff:
David Crawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liping Zhu v. City of South El Monte et al
as 2:2019cv05462
Defendant:
O. Garcia, J. Martinez, B. Comparan and others
Plaintiff:
Liping Zhu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 0:2019cv00973
Defendant:
Ms. Christa T. Bell, Mr. David B. Love, South Carolina Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 19-6217
Defendant:
M. L. COUNTS, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, C. COMBS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
D. C. STALLARD and WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
