Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-416
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. BARBOSA, CHO, Mid-State Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
JORDAN v. OAKES et al
as 3:2023cv24730
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE JORDAN, JR
Defendant:
B OAKES, SUSAN DOVE and KENNY MATELESKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oakes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Oakes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 6:2021cv06604
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Piccolo, Hill, S White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, A. Rodriguez, Uhler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Moore, Mr. Miclteler, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Demeris Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Santa Rosa Correctional
as 3:2020cv01422
Defendant:
Major B. Oaks and Mr. Pamtrye
Plaintiff:
Zuberlon L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. FRAME
as 3:2020cv05968
Plaintiff:
STACY ANTONIO SCOTT, JR and STACY CHANEL
Defendant:
W TURNER, D DICE, P TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITAKER v. OAKS
as 3:2020cv05641
Defendant:
D STEWART, B OAKS, A MARMON and others
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
