Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Robinson v. City of Garland Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02496
Plaintiff: Matthew B Robinson
Defendant: City of Garland, Texas, NFN Ivy, NFN Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuigan v. Jarvis et al
as 6:2009cv01719
Petitioner: David John McGuigan
Respondent: Tamara Jarvis, Jay Gilchrist Trezevant, Rachelle DesVaux Bedke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Keith Wood v. Cheryl Robinson
as 08-8000
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH R. WOOD
Defendant - Appellee: CHERYL B. ROBINSON, Capt./Medical Director, STANLEY FURMAN, Jail Doctor and CLARENCE T. WOODY, Sheriff
McCajah v. Robinson
as 1:2008cv00967
Plaintiff: Harris McCajah
Defendant: B. Robinson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEATH v. ROBINSON
as 4:2008cv00157
Plaintiff: DARRELL L LEATH
Defendant: K B ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Morrow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00235
Petitioner: William B. Robinson
Defendant: Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Morrow
as 1:2008cv00048
Petitioner: William B Robinson
Defendant: Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leath v. Robinson
as 3:2007cv01188
Plaintiff: Darrell L. Leath
Defendant: L. B. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Robinson et al
as 1:2007cv00602
Plaintiff: Keith R. Wood
Defendant: Cheryl B. Robinson, Stanley Furman and Clarence T. Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00001
Petitioner: TONY B ROBINSON
Respondent: JAMES MCDONOUGH and CHARLIE CRIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?