Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Young v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility
as 1:2016cv01420
Petitioner:
Otis B. Young
Respondent:
Great Meadow Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Babu Kalluvilayil v. Classification Headquarters, et al
as 15-10454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABU S. KALLUVILAYIL
Defendant - Appellee:
CLASSIFICATION HEADQUARTERS, EDDY WHEELER, Warden, R. LEAL, Assistant Warden and others
Victor Johnson v. N. Cain, et al
as 14-31279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
N. BURL CAIN, FORD E. STINSON, JR., J. SCHUYLER MARVIN and others
Bradley Barton v. R. Huerta, et al
as 14-11048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY JARED BARTON
Defendant - Appellee:
R. M. HUERTA, Correctional Officer, W. SIRINGI, Warden and B. YOUNG, Correctional Officer
Taylor v. Swift
as 14-3382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roy Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Marshall Linda Swift, M.D.C. Co. B. Young, #11986, S. Lewis, Deputy Warden #97 and others
Dejames Hendebson et al v. Lawrence B. Young
as 2:2014cv04268
Plaintiff:
DeJames Henderson and Tracy Mitchell
Defendant:
Lawrence B. Young and Lawrence B. Young
Robert Davis v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 14-10624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS, also known as Clarence Willie-Griffin
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, B. YOUNG, W. DOANE and others
Barton v. Huerta et al
as 1:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. Barton
Defendant:
R.M. Huerta, W. Siringi and B. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Stephens et al
as 1:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
William Stephens, B. Young, W. Doane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #477836 v. Hienz et al
as 1:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
James Jackson #477836
Defendant:
Daniel Hienz, Unknown McKee, Unknown MaCauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
