Cases 61 - 70 of 239
Beard v. Dismis Charities Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Dismis Charities Inc., Mr. Norman, Mr. Haydon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ray Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Ebbert
as 2:2019cv02819
Petitioner:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Respondent:
("The B.O.P.") United States Penitentiary Lewisburg and Warden David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Godwin v. B.O.P. et al
as 5:2019cv00510
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
Kathy P. Lane, Leonor Bonnet-Engebreston, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin v. B.O.P. et al
as 6:2019cv01848
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
Kathy P. Lane, Leonor Bonnet-Engebreston, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2019cv02308
Respondent:
No Named Respondents, B.O.P., Executive Director of Colorado Dept. of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
William D. Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Noe v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2019cv02148
Defendant:
Kelly, B.O.P., Sara M. Revell and others
Plaintiff:
Peter George Noe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Bringas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Mark Ien, Ms. Unknown Johnson, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Octavio Bringas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez v. Unknown B.O.P. Officials
as 1:2019cv01139
Defendant:
Unknown B.O.P. Officials
Plaintiff:
Ray Martinez and Raymond Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bringas v. United States of America B.O.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00163
Respondent:
Mark Ien, United States of America B.O.P., Hugh Hurwitz and others
Petitioner:
Octavio Bringas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ivan Boston v. William Bennett
as 19-6274
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA GROVE, Assistant Health Service Administrator, TIFFANY SMITH, Chief Dentist, THOMAS KANE, Director of B.O.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN BOSTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
