Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Dourgthy et al
as 6:2023cv03224
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeJuan Chavez
Defendant:
Chris Dourgthy and Sarah Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barker v. SCE, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Mike Barker
Defendant:
SCE, Inc. doing business as Cowboy's Cranes and Larry Promsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Barker Stramm v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Brandi E. Barker Stramm
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barker v. Triumph Foods, LLC
as 5:2022cv06033
Plaintiff:
Robert Barker
Defendant:
Triumph Foods, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chandler v. Tipton Correctional Center Staff et al
as 2:2021cv04210
Plaintiff:
Kevin T Chandler
Defendant:
Tipton Correctional Center Staff, Derrick R Ebeirus, Emily Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker et al v Nestle Purina Petcare Company
as 4:2021cv01075
Plaintiff:
Michelle Barker, Susanna Grigoli and Carrie Carter
Defendant:
Nestle Purina PetCare Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barker v. USA
as 4:2021cv00470
Petitioner:
Curtis David Barker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cassidy v. Reger et al
as 2:2021cv04100
Defendant:
Davis, Reger, Brock Van Loo and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Paul Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
