Cases 1 - 10 of 48
USA v. Barry Jones
as 23-6040
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY JONES
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19528
Plaintiff:
BARRY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19540
Plaintiff:
BARRY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BECK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16363
Plaintiff:
ANJALETTA BECK, ARNALDO SANTIAGO, ROBERT JEROME TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beck et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Anjaletta Beck, Arnaldo Santiago, Robert Jerome Taylor and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
USA v. Barry Jones
as 23-5420
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY JONES
Jones v. Carranza et al
as 3:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Barry Jones
Defendant:
Georege Carranza, Daniels, Ziese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barry Jones v. Paul Noel, et al
as 22-2992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PAUL NOEL and DR. HARESH PANDYA
Jones vs. Aiken County, South Carolina et al
as 0:2021cv00681
Plaintiff:
Barry Jones
Defendant:
Aiken County, South Carolina and Aiken County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy III et al v. Aiken County, South Carolina et al
as 0:2021cv00421
Defendant:
Aiken County, Aiken County Detention Center and Aiken County, South Carolina
Plaintiff:
Barry Jones, Diaz Guillermo Jr., Ronald K. Kennedy III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
