Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
JOYCE v. MOORE, et al.,
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR, YVONNE CRAVEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEANE v. CAROLINA PIZZA GROUP, INC.
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BEANE
Defendant:
CAROLINA PIZZA GROUP, INC. doing business as PAPA JOHNS PIZZA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Malik v. Mecklenburg County Jail Administrator et al
as 3:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
Akeem Alin-Nafis Abdullah-Malik and Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Jail Administrator, FNU Parker, Sheriff Eddie Cathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Okyere v. John Bean Technologies Corporation
as 4:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
Peter Okyere
Defendant:
John Bean Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Okyere v. John Bean Technologies Corporation
as 5:2020cv00190
Plaintiff:
Peter Okyere
Defendant:
John Bean Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beane et al
as 5:2020cv00095
Defendant:
Stacey L Beane, Justin N Deckert and Travis Laska
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
JOYCE v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00188
Defendant:
CATHERINE BEANE, BILLY COLLINS, ROY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAN v. TRIDENT MARKETING
as 1:2018cv00581
Defendant:
TRIDENT MARKETING
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE BEAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
