Cases 1 - 10 of 71
RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
MARK RUTHRAUFF
Defendant:
CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., CENTURION, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. LIEBEL et al
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
DEVON BANKS
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL, J. FAUST, D. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
EARL MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CASEY CAMBEL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIYO LEWIS
Defendant:
BEDWELL, AIRMARK and FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEDWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
REBECCA J. BEDWELL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ORR v. CORRIGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CORRIGAN, BYRD, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TAYLOR, IV
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DANIEL BEDWELL, COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEATLEY v. BRYD et al
as 1:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. and ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR.
Defendant:
SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
BRIAN BUTLER and DANIEL BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
