Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2021cv00241
Defendant:
Cary Police, Pat McCrory, State of North Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deal v. Department of Prison Records et al
as 5:2018ct03086
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Prison Records, Health Department Records, Department of Prison Combined Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAL v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
PAULA SMITH, KENNTH PRICE, JR., BEVERLY PERDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Easley et al
as 5:2018ct03077
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Easley, Beverly Perdue, Pat McCrory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2017mc00001
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mike Easly, Beverly Perdue and others
Langley v. Butler et al
as 5:2015ct03274
Plaintiff:
Ferris R. Langley
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Perdue et al
as 5:2015mc00041
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr. and J.F.D.
Respondent:
Beverly Perdue, Albert Singer, Anthony Morriss and others
DEAL v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
BEVERLY PERDUE, KENNETH PRICE, JR, BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Butler et al
as 5:2014ct03142
Plaintiff:
David Earl Jones
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rippy-Bey et al v. North Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Rippy-Bey and The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes
Defendant:
North Carolina, State of, Roy Cooper, Michael F. Easley and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
