Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bishop v. State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Karen Bishop
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Robert Valle, LLC, Robert Valle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Moreland v. West Virginia Dept. of Health et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Moreland
Defendant:
West Virginia Dept. of Health doing business as David A. Bishop, Steven Compton, Jason Trautwein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bishop v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Mason Bishop
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Tango Networks, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00546
Plaintiff:
Kathleen S. Clarke
Defendant:
Tango Networks, Inc., Nextep Business Solutions, Inc., Trinet HR II-A, Inc. and doing business as Trinet Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Milton Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Milton Police Department, Patrolman Adkins, Patrolman Withers and others
Plaintiff:
Andred Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Bishop
as 5:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lane
Defendant:
Greg Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop et al v. Triumph Motorcycles (America) Limited et al
as 3:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Susan Bishop and Estate of John F. Couls
Defendant:
Fredericktown Yamaha, Triumph Motorcycles (America) Limited and Triumph Motorcycles Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Fiorito v. Dr. Anderson et al
as 1:2018cv00182
Defendant:
Ian Connors, TFC Edwards, Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Bishop v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00653
Plaintiff:
Sally Bishop
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
