Cases 21 - 30 of 707
Joiner v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Antonio Labaron Joiner
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wally Boone v. Alexander
as 23-7247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLY BOONE
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. ALEXANDER, Head Nurse/Medical Administrator in 53 Medical Department at Greensville Correctional Center, R. BONNER, Nurse and S. THORNHILL
Webb v. McClain et al
as 3:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Trevor D Webb
Defendant:
McClain, Bonner, Coggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Devonte D. Mason
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Office, Chief Burnett, Captain Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Core Civics of America
as 3:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
David Bonner
Defendant:
Core Civics of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Coffee et al
as 2:2023cv02714
Petitioner:
Byron Pipkin
Respondent:
Lee V. Coffee and Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tamar Harvey v. Ralph Coleman
as 23-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH R. COLEMAN, Lieutenant, TIMOTHY W. GREEN, Unit Manager of Housing Unit 6, M.A. BAILEY, Senior Warden and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT HOBBS, SERGEANT WOODBURY, E. CLAY, AD Food Service Manager and others
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04133
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Bonner
as 23-50761
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Timothy Bonner
Bonner v. B. Polleck
as 4:2023cv03743
Petitioner:
Ryan Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
