Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,993
Morrison et al v. Air Parts & Supply, Co. et al
as 1:2019cv20837
Defendant: The Boeing Company, Air Parts & Supply, Co., Honey International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor-in-interest to Allied Corporation, as successor in interest to The Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Roy E Morrison and Connie L Gladhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Houston v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2019at00066
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a Alliedsignal Inc., as success-in-interest to the Bendix Corporation, The Boeing Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Sherrie Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff: AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Defendant: Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Genuine Parts Company, National Automotive Parts Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Williamson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01391
Defendant: Cameron International Corp., Industrial Holdings Corporation f/k/a Carborundum Company, Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Russell Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Farris et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04186
Defendant: IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.), BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION) and others
Plaintiff: MELVA FARRIS and GARY FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Reinbold v. Advance Auto Parts Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00605
Plaintiff: Janice Reinbold
Defendant: Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: Blackmer Pump Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation , Crane Co. and others
Cross_defendant: Blackmer Pump Company , Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PINE v. AURORA PUMP et al
as 2:2018cv00927
Cross Claimant: STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant: KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., GEORGIA PACIFIC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Cross Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WARREN PUMPS LLC and others
Plaintiff: LYDIA PINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant: AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant: PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Alexander et al v.Honeywell International et al
as 2:2017cv12062
Defendant: Spirax Sarco, Inc., Valero Energy Corporation, Plastics Engineering Company and others
Plaintiff: William W. Alexander and William K. Alexander
Not Classified By Court: General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?