Cases 1 - 10 of 1,136
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Brown v. Leutz et al
as 3:2024cv03096
Plaintiff:
Cassius Brown
Defendant:
Darr Leutz, Brittany Greene, Zorian Trusewych and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bowens et al
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Demond Williams
Defendant:
Officer Bowens, Officer MakanJuda, Officer Jeffers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Joshua K. Bowen
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. BOWEN et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
NORMAN DAVIS
Respondent:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN and CENTRAL STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lemke v. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lemke and Angel Marie
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Jerome Greenfield, Nichole Francis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonadier v. Whittington et al
as 5:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Johnny Melvin Lonadier, III
Defendant:
Julian C Whittington, Lt Bowen and Janice Cefalu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
James William Fletcher
Defendant:
Amira D. Fox, Robert Bowen and Kathleen A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Prock et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Nathaniel Bowen
Defendant:
Prock, Pittman, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
