Cases 1 - 10 of 50
DAVIS v. WAWA
as 2:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
WAWA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Randle-Giles v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Edgar Royce Randle-Giles
Defendant:
Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22766
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ernster v. City of Mt. Washington, KY et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ernster
Defendant:
City of Mt. Washington, KY, Bradley Aubin, Mark Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01875
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16313
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LESTER v. TRIAD PIZZA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Scott Lester and SCOTT LESTER, JR.
Defendant:
Bradley Davis, Triad Pizza LLC, BD Pizza Co. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BULLOCK et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09636
Plaintiff:
KALLSEY BULLOCK and BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39493
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
