Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Captain Lamar and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Warden McClain, Wexford Health Care, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Consolidated Defendant:
Mary Collins, Mr. Turner, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Clemons et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Officer Redd, Officer Streeter and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Genovese
as 1:2017cv00098
Petitioner:
M. Brandon Adams
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dauntain v. Bishop, et al
as 8:2017cv02962
Petitioner:
Brandon Adam Dauntain
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop Jr. and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Beane et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Benjamin Beane, Kevin Genovese, Stacy Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Tony Parker, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Adams v. Tammy Ford
as 15-5451
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
TAMMY FORD
Michael Adams v. Jason Woodall, et al
as 15-5450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRANDON ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON WOODALL, DOUGLAS STEPHENS, RONALD TURNER and others
Adams v. Holloway
as 3:2014cv01055
Petitioner:
Michael Brandon Adams
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
