Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, OFFICER JACKSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ishman v. Slocumb et al
as 5:2024ct03055
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Ishman
Defendant:
Officer Slocumb, Lieutenant Thompson, Captain Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGETT v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A. HARGETT
Defendant:
AMY COLLINS, NORMA BLACKSHEAR, WAYNE BRATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGETT v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER HARGETT
Defendant:
AMY COLLINS, DANIEL HEADRIX, NORMA BLACKSHEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUESDALE v TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adaesha Truesdale, ALFRED ALLISON, ALICIA BOWE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TMX Finance of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
R.S. V. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WOODS CHARTER SCHOOL COMPANY, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
R.S. and R. S.
Defendant:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WOODS CHARTER SCHOOL COMPANY, WOODS CHARTER SCHOOL and DOES 1 TO 10
Petitioner:
Bratcher Adams PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRATCHER v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00876
Plaintiff:
GARY BRATCHER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Bratcher v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Bratcher
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER M. BRATCHER
as 1:2013mc00012
Respondent:
IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER M. BRATCHER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
