Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kass v. Lt. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Hannah Kass
Defendant:
Lt. Ramirez, Officer Cory Beiermann and Det. Brian Randolph Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nivedita Bondhu v. Christopher Wray, et al
as 23-5163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nivedita Bondhu
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Paulette Furbert-Harris, Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia and others
RANDOLPH v. MOORE et al
as 2:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RANDOLPH
Defendant:
JUSTIN MOORE, LARRY BOGGS, ERIC HAAG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EUBANKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RANDOLPH EUBANKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RANDOLPH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81127
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. City of Baldwin Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00147
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. City of Baldwin, Georgia et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 8:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Plaintiff:
Brian Randolph
Randolph v. Gramiak et al
as 5:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Defendant:
Tom Gramiak, Edwina Johnson, Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00816
Plaintiff:
Brian Randolph
Defendant:
Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
