Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Bryant v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Roger Bryant
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bryant v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
Leonor C. Bryant
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02143
Plaintiff:
Killian Andrews, Manuel Arevalo, George Ashford and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Arndt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ferguson, Ahrens Dederscheck, Ernest Cano and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
301, 712, 2103 AND 3151 LLC et al v. City of Minneapolis
as 0:2020cv01901
Plaintiff:
FLETCHER PROPERTIES, INC., GARFIELD COURT PARTNERSHIP, L.L.P., DUPONT PROPERTIES LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
301, 712, 2103 and 3151 LLC et al v. City of Minneapolis
as 0:2020cv01904
Plaintiff:
FLETCHER PROPERTIES, INC., GARFIELD COURT PARTNERSHIP, L.L.P., DUPONT PROPERTIES LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatton et al v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2019cv02837
Defendant:
Christine Sell, Sharon Olson, Mark Deutsch and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Russell Hatton and Michael Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ringler et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02260
Plaintiff:
Bradley Smith, Andrew Niezgoda, Cory Myres and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hays et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02215
Plaintiff:
Sherry Jackson, Timothy Heckerman, Christopher Heinze and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC, Aearo, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
