Cases 21 - 30 of 462
Wilburn et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 4:2023cv13170
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wilburn and Todd Pollard
Defendant:
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Bureau of, Steven Dettelbach, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Second Amendment Fdn v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 23-11157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated, Rainier Arms, L.L.C., Samuel Walley and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity Director of the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and others
William Collins, III v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM COLLINS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, STEVEN MICHAEL DETTELBACH, Director Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General and others
National Association v. Garland
as 23-11138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
National Association for Gun Rights, Incorporated, Texas Gun Rights, Incorporated, Patrick Carey and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, In his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Valvis v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 1:2023cv24199
Plaintiff:
Oscar Valvis
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,Firearms and Explisives, MIAMI DADE COUNTY, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Cargill v. Garland
as 23-50856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Cargill
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others
Joshua McCoy v. ATF
as 23-2085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSHUA CLAY MCCOY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated as a Class, TYLER DALTON MCGRATH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated as a Class, IAN FLETCHER SHACKLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated as a Class and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, STEVEN MICHAEL DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Jack Graham, III v. Steve Albro
as 23-2064
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACK H. GRAHAM, III, d/b/a Kathye's Jewelry and Pawn Shop
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVE ALBRO, Director of Industry Operations Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant:
Members of Congress
Mark Johnson Blount, I v. United States, et al
as 23-3245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Jerome Johnson Blount, I
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, in his official and individual capacities, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, as agency of the United States of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
