Cases 41 - 50 of 281
George v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Romancee Oshay George
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurtado-Valois v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Staff
as 5:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hurtado-Valois
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hurtado-Valois v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Staff
as 2:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hurtado-Valois
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clervrain v. Erich et al
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Alysa D. Erich, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Republic of Haiti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neilson v. Ryle
as 1:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
Elet Neilson
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons Alderson Federal Prison Camp, Warden Carver and Warden Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duerson v. McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00002
Petitioner:
Anthony Duerson
Respondent:
Ryan McCaffrey and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Bud Pratt Williams
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donald v. D. L. Young
as 5:2021cv00538
Petitioner:
Patrick Andrew Donald
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
