Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Restaurant Brands International Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Burger King and Restaurant Brands International Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Schuster Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00648
Defendant:
Schuster Enterprises, Inc. and Schuster Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Burger King 19956
Plaintiff:
Terrance D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moore v. GPS Hospitality Partners IV, LLC
as 1:2017cv00500
Plaintiff:
LaShondra Moore
Defendant:
GPS Hospitality Partners IV, LLC and GPS Hospitality Partners IV, LLC d/b/a Burger King
Cause Of Action: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Powell et al v. Premier Kings Inc
as 7:2017cv00790
Defendant:
Premier Kings Inc and Premier Kings Inc d/b/a Burger King
Plaintiff:
DeShannon Kinnion, Jameka Powell and Aphtine Hill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
