Cases 41 - 50 of 2,193
BURK v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv05042
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
MS. DAVIS, PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and D. VARNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burk v. Superior Court Catoosa Co
as 4:2023cv00294
Petitioner:
Arnold Cordell Burk
Respondent:
Superior Court Catoosa Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burks v. Ober et al
as 2:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Talmadge V. Burks, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter Ober and Kevin Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2023cv02807
Plaintiff:
Xavier Demeris Stewart
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri, Bruce Barlett, Ken Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Harris v. Christine Brannon, et al
as 23-3323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY G. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE BRANNON and BRIAN BURKE
Bless v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv24594
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Warden J. Love, Sergeant France/Frantz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burks v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Burks, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Burks, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
LT ADRIAN WEST, Deputy Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maus, Brian v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Brian Maus
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Lizzie Tegels, Garceau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
