Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Busbee v. ServiceToday!
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Steven Busbee
Defendant:
ServiceToday!
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Antley v. Aiken County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv06890
Plaintiff:
Derek Clark Antley
Defendant:
Aiken County Sheriff's Department, Andrew L. Busbee, Michael Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
BUSBEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27008
Plaintiff:
MADISON BUSBEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Busbee v. ServiceToday Telemarketing LLC
as 3:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Steven Busbee
Defendant:
ServiceToday Telemarketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barack et al v. Bankroll Capital, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael Barack, Michelle Barack and Gerald Busbee
Defendant:
Bankroll Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
US v. Yomere Busbee
as 23-4227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
YOMERE JUAN BUSBEE, a/k/a Ram
Busbee v. ServiceToday Telemarketing, LLC
as 4:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Steven Busbee
Defendant:
ServiceToday Telemarketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BUSBEE v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
BRIAN A BUSBEE and BRIAN ALLEN BUSBEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Busbee v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Brian Allen Busbee
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Busbee v. Benson et al
as 4:2022cv01061
Plaintiff:
Gerald Busbee
Defendant:
Levelle G. Benson, Jr. and Benson Investment Group
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
