Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Sykes v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00629
Plaintiff: Robert Sykes
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC an Ohio Limited Liability Company doing business as Macy's, Macy's Inc. and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Loandepot.com, LLC, v. Flashhouse LLC, et al
as 8:2024cv00281
Petitioner: Loandepot.com, LLC, a Delaware corporation
Defendant: FLASHHOUSE LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Flashhouse LLC and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff: Loandepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
DAVID STAPLETON in his capacity as COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER for the RECEIVERSHIP ENTITY, including ZADEH KICKS, LLC dba ZADEH KICKS, an Oregon limited liability corporation v. THE SNEAK PEAK LLC, an Ohio limited liability company
as 0:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: DAVID STAPLETON in his capacity as COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER for the RECEIVERSHIP ENTITY, including ZADEH KICKS, LLC dba ZADEH KICKS, an Oregon limited liability corporation
Defendant: THE SNEAK PEAK LLC, an Ohio limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Full Circle Villagebrook GP, LLC v. Protech 2004-D, LLC, et al
as 23-2974
Plaintiff / Appellant: FULL CIRCLE VILLAGEBROOK GP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee: PROTECH 2004-D, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, AMTAX HOLDINGS 436, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company and ALDEN TORCH FINANCIAL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Moke America LLC v. Moke USA, LLC
as 23-1720
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOKE AMERICA LLC, a New York limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant: MOKE USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant: AMERICAN CUSTOM GOLF CARS, INC., a California corporation
Not Yet Classified: MOKE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
3Rd Party Defendant: BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIPS I-X, JOHN & JANE DOES I-X and others
Integrated Sports Media and Entertainment PPV, LLC v. One Palm Group, LLC, et al
as 23-55604
Plaintiff / Appellee: INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT PPV, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company
Defendant / Appellant: ONE PALM GROUP, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, GROVER HENRY COLIN NIX IV, an individual and CROWN STONE PARTNERS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant: LIVECAST 365, LLC, an Ohio Limited Liability Company, TIMOTHY BRILL DEVORE, an individual and CHARLES CHUCK LANG, Jr., an individual
Counter Defendant: STANLEY STEPHEN HUNTSMAN and TONY MARTINEZ
Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited
as 23-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant: MOKE AMERICA LLC, a New York limited liability company
Appellee: MOKE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN CUSTOM GOLF CARS, INC., a California corporation and MOKE USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3Rd Party Defendant: BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIPS I-X, JOHN & JANE DOES I-X and others
Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited
as 23-1634
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOKE AMERICA LLC, a New York limited liability company
Appellant: MOKE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Defendant: AMERICAN CUSTOM GOLF CARS, INC., a California corporation and MOKE USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3Rd Party Defendant: BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIPS I-X, JOHN & JANE DOES I-X and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00031
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dieomatic Incorporated v. General Aluminum Mfg. LLC
as 1:2023cv00522
Plaintiff: Dieomatic Incorporated an Iowa corporation doing business as Cosma Casting Michigan
Defendant: General Aluminum Mfg. LLC an Ohio limited liability company doing business as General Aluminum Mfg. Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?