Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Bah v. Saller et al
as 1:2013cv01114
Plaintiff:
Rafael Bah
Defendant:
Officer Saller, Officer Perry and Officer Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ho Y. Wong v. Patrick Donahoe
as 12-2568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HO Y. WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postermaster General and ABDUL R. BAH, Manager, General Accounting Branch USPS
Wong v. Donahoe et al
as 2:2012cv00636
Plaintiff:
Ho Y. Wong
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe and Abdul R. Bah
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Fernando Bustillo v. Art Beeler
as 12-6187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
ART BEELER, ANTHONY SCARANTINO, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR and others
Defendant:
NURSE BAH
Bah v. Prince William County et al
as 1:2010cv00187
Plaintiff:
Tanu Bah
Defendant:
Prince William County, City of Manassas Police Department, John J. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carmichael v. Officer Bah
as 8:2009cv03444
Plaintiff:
Donnell Carmichael
Defendant:
Officer Bah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mountaga Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 09-2217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOUNTAGA BAH and MICHELLE JOHNSON BAH
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Defendant - None:
HSBC BANK USA, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED and others
Bah v. The Town of Cheverly et al
as 8:2009cv02333
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Bah
Defendant:
The Town of Cheverly, The Town of Cheverly, Buddy Robshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 8:2008cv03429
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank West, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Mountaga Bah
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
