Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 300
DeJordy v. Gbessia Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff: Jamie DeJordy
Defendant: Gbessia Transportation, Inc., Mamadou Bah and Northland Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00142
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denial of Application for Naturalization
REDACTED PRA 18 U.S.C. 3123 DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER NO. 22-05 (BAH)
as 1:2022pr09999
In Re: REDACTED PRA 18 U.S.C. 3123 DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER NO. 22-05 (BAH)
REDACTED SCA 18 U.S.C. 2703(a),(c) & (d) DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER NO. 22-05 (BAH)
as 1:2022sc09999
In Re: REDACTED SCA 18 U.S.C. 2703(a),(c) & (d) DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER NO. 22-05 (BAH)
REDACTED SCA AND PRA DOCUMENTS PROMPTED BY MLAT PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER NO. 22-05 (BAH)
as 1:2022ml09999
In Re: REDACTED SCA AND PRA DOCUMENTS PROMPTED BY MLAT PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER NO. 22-05 (BAH)
Bah v. Apple Inc., et al
as 21-1868
Plaintiff / Appellant: OUSMANE BAH
Defendant / Appellee: APPLE INC. and SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02806
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Saiko Bah v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2282
Petitioner: SAIKO BAH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Markel Insurance Company v. Sumpter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv02239
Plaintiff: Markel Insurance Company
Defendant: Roderick Wia Sumpter, K&O Fitness, LLC and Mohamed Bah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
USA v. Bah
as 21-40712
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Muhamed Pathe Bah

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?