Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Whitaker v. Smith et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00600
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wayne Whitaker
Defendant:
Barbour County Jail, Tyrone Smith, Laqeitta Denison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Baker-Hill Industries, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv60535
Defendant:
Matthew Ricci and Baker-Hill Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Dixon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Kurlander et al v. Kaplan et al
as 8:2019cv00742
Defendant:
Kaplan Voekler Cunningham & Frank PLC, Robert R. Kaplan and Robert R. Kaplan, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Edwin M. Stanton, Baker Hill Holding, LLC, Stanton Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurlander et al v. Kaplan et al
as 8:2019cv00644
Defendant:
Robert R. Kaplan, Scott Musil, HC Government Realty Trust, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Baker Hill Holding and Philip Kurlander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuvin v. Baker-Hill Industries, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv80391
Plaintiff:
Romeo Cuvin
Defendant:
Baker-Hill Industries, Inc. and Matthew Ricci
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Board of Trustees of the UFCW Local 50 Pension Fund v. Baker Hill Packing Inc.
as 2:2013cv01888
Defendant:
Baker Hill Packing Inc.
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the UFCW Local 50 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Brown v. Columbia Retail Baker Hill, LLC
as 1:2011cv06660
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Brown
Defendant:
Columbia Retail Baker Hill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GRIMES v. BAKER HILL CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
as 1:2009cv00276
Plaintiff:
TERRI GRIMES
Defendant:
BAKER HILL CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAKER HILL CORPORATION v. CHESAPEAKE BANK
as 1:2008cv01743
Plaintiff:
BAKER HILL CORPORATION
Defendant:
CHESAPEAKE BANK and CHESAPEAKE BANK
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smith v. Baker-Hill Industries, Inc.
as 0:2008cv60506
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Baker-Hill Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
