Cases 31 - 40 of 355
Abrajan v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2022cv12931
Plaintiff:
Adan Yuset Ballesteros Abrajan
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., d/b/a The Home Depot and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. Doing business as Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(HC) Ballesteros-Duarte v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv01836
Petitioner:
Luis Ballesteros-Duarte
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03372
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Ballesteros v. Garza
as 1:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Benjamin I. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Ballesteros v. Garza
as 1:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Benjamin I. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Saenz et al
as 4:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
Lloyd E Kelley and Lloyd Kelley
Defendant:
Joe Saenz, Joseph Hibbard, John Brannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gary Bettencourt v. Ballesteros, et al
as 22-15875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY RAY BETTENCOURT
Defendant / Appellee:
BALLESTEROS, LVN, Y. MANSOUR, CHETANA SISODIN, PA-C and others
Ballesteros v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv03198
Plaintiff:
Odilma Ballesteros
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BALLESTEROS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00258
Petitioner:
JOSE ANGEL DE SANTIAGO BALLESTEROS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jaramillo Ballesteros et al v. Boeing Company
as 2:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rossario Jaramillo Ballesteros and Raquel Javela Rojas
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
