Cases 21 - 28 of 28
EMC Mortgage Corporation v. Edwards et al.
as 6:2012cv00611
Plaintiff:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Barbara Edwards, Any and All Unknown Parties, Hillside Terrace Condominium Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
EDWARDS v. PATHMARK et al
as 2:2010cv05530
Plaintiff:
BARBARA EDWARDS
Defendant:
PATHMARK , BILL GORMAN and THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allen et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07925
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy Allen, Stacy Allen, Stacy Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051 Personal Injury
Edwards et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02356
Plaintiff:
Johnny Edwards, Johnny Edwards, Barbara Edwards and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. and Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Risch v. Kenton County et al
as 2:2009cv00050
Defendant:
Dr. Isaac P. Thomas, Kenton County, Kentucky Jailer Terry Carl, Deputy Joy White and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A. Risch
Not Yet Classified:
Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company
as 2:2008cv02707
Plaintiff:
Barbara Edwards
Defendant:
Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Edwards v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv02630
Plaintiff:
Barbara Edwards
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
