Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Haydock et al
as 1:2025cv10662
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Defendant:
Timothy G. Haydock, Barbara Moss, Margaret Reichenbach and others
Counter-Claimant:
Barbara Moss and Timothy G. Haydock
Counter-Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut v. Haydock et al
as 1:2024cv12837
Defendant:
Timothy G Haydock, Margaret Reichenbach, Barbara Moss and others
Plaintiff:
The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Hess et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hess, Carolyn Johnson, Thomas McKee and others
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moss v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Barbara Moss
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MOSS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv12665
Plaintiff:
BARBARA MOSS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schulze v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 5:2016cv00521
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Plaintiff:
Barbara Moss Schulze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Moss et al v. Goodfellow et al
as 1:2014cv09875
Plaintiff:
Barbara Moss and Jonathan Moss
Defendant:
Francis Goodfellow, Mark Lobel, Carla J. Lobel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Schulze et al v. Vella et al
as 5:2007cv00915
Plaintiff:
Barbara Moss Schulze and Randall Martin Schulze
Defendant:
John Vella, Cole D. Patton, April L. Gremillion and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
