Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Vega v. Paramore et al
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Waiter H. Paramore, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Feds for Medical Freedom et al v. Biden, Jr. et al
as 3:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Local 918, American Federation of Government Employees, Highland Engineering, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., The United States of America, Pete Buttigieg and others
Counter Claimant:
Marcus William Thornton
Claimant:
Joseph Charles Ainsworth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25926
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BARRETT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Barrett Smith v. City of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2019cv04366
Defendant:
City of Santa Barbara, Officer Thomas Van Eyck, Santa Barbara Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Barrett Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 12.78 acres of land, more or less, ini Panola County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 12.78 acres of land, more or less, ini Panola County, Mississippi, Lea Anderson Garrott , Suzanne S. Garrott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
McGroarty v. Barrett Smith & Associates
as 1:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Duston McGroarty
Defendant:
Barrett Smith & Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Ross Dress For Less, Inc.
as 1:2012cv20270
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Barrett Smith
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
