Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Battle v. San Bernardino et al
as 5:2026cv05436
Plaintiff:
Amos Battle
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and Suni Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Battle v. Kerner
as 8:2026cv02663
Plaintiff:
Quadavis Battle
Defendant:
Dave Kerner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Macon et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2026cv02519
Plaintiff:
Rachel Macon and Danielle Ross
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Kameron Christopher Harvanek, Brittany Ann Chastang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Battle v. Pavion Corp. et al
as 1:2026cv03039
Plaintiff:
Curtis Battle
Defendant:
Pavion Corp., formerly Corbett Technology Solutions, Inc. and Jaelen A. Gadson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle/Wrongful Death
Battle v. Benson et al
as 2:2026cv13481
Plaintiff:
Ah'Nice Nekol-Andrea Battle
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson, Dana Nessel and Rachael Eubanks
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Battle v. Dallas et al
as 3:2026cv01287
Plaintiff:
Ronald Battle
Defendant:
Lt. Dallas, C/O Jara, C/O Gearhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
