Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Scott v. Hitchcock Center for Women, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
Denita Scott
Defendant:
Hitchcock Center for Women, Inc. and Mary Bazie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bazi v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv02208
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Mata Bazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Billy Tyler v. Lesley Douglas, et al
as 12-3792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Billy Tyler
Defendant - Appellee:
Lesley Douglas, Canila, Judge, Lohaus, Judge and others
Tyler v. Douglas et al
as 8:2012cv00239
Defendant:
Bazis, Canila, Lesley Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. Bazis et al
as 8:2012cv00178
Defendant:
Ann, Susan Bazis, John Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Young v. Bazis et al
as 4:2011cv03219
Defendant:
Susan Bazis, Brumbaugh & Brumbaugh & Quandahl, Clerk of Douglas County Court and others
Plaintiff:
Goly Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Thornsberry et al
as 0:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jonathan Thornsberry , Stacy Thornsberry and Unknown Spouse Bazie Dulen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Aka Ayemou, et al v. Dow Chemical Company
as 09-55156
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AKA GEORGES AYEMOU, ATTEKE ADOLPHE AYEMOU, NOGBOU ANATOLE AYEMOU and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation
Aka Ayemou, et al v. Dow Chemical Company
as 08-80174
Plaintiff - Respondent:
AKA GEORGES AYEMOU, ATTEKE ADOLPHE AYEMOU, NOGBOU ANATOLE AYEMOU and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Failure to make decision on naturalization petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
