Cases 21 - 30 of 602
Bell v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02876
Petitioner:
Kent Bell
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Abello et al
as 1:2023cv02881
Plaintiff:
Enrico Brown
Defendant:
Frederick Abello, Ofc. Master Corp. Bell and Chaplin John Doe of MCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Qualls et al
as 7:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Charles Derek Bell
Defendant:
J. Qualls, Unknown Name-Police Norton City, VA and City of Norton, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv04577
Plaintiff:
Lem Douglas Vaughan, III
Defendant:
Chief J. Hicks, Medical Mrs. Bell, Officials K. Hornberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bell v. Reedy et al
as 7:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Charles Derek Bell
Defendant:
Deputy D. Reedy and Unknown Name
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Sgt. M. Jinks et al
as 9:2023cv02919
Plaintiff:
Andy Trinity Cook
Defendant:
Sgt. M. Jinks, Ofc. C Eagan and Nurse L. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bell v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv01450
Petitioner:
Kent M. Bell
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. USA
as 3:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Alexander Edward Bell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bell v. Warden Browne, et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Respondent:
Warden Browne, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
