Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Officer Templin, Lieutenant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00313
Defendant:
Captain Smite, Jimmy Thomas, Cpt. Hutton and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Elmore County Commission et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00281
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Officer Bell, Bill Franklin and Elmore County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Officer Yelder, Alabama Department of Corrections, Officer Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Valenza et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
James Brazier, Houston County, Alabama, Houston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Christena Denis Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortson v. Jamison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00493
Defendant:
David Rogers, J. Thomas, Sgt. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Fortson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00227
Plaintiff:
Frederick Bell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peters et al v. Liberty Bell Moving Group et al
as 1:2019cv00182
Defendant:
Direct Van Lines Services, Inc. and Liberty Bell Moving Group
Plaintiff:
Sharon Dannen-Peters and Kendall Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
