Cases 1 - 10 of 280
Dunbar v. Davila et al
as 2:2024cv01593
Defendant:
Jack L Davila, Janna Hodges and Jesica Bellinger
Plaintiff:
Roy Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barker v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2024cv07941
Defendant:
Suffolk County and Nastaja Bellinger
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bellinger v. Schwendimann et al
as 3:2024cv01170
Defendant:
Hans L. Schwendimann and Beverly J. White
Plaintiff:
Warren D. Bellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fenty v. Bellinger et al
as 2:2024cv00753
Defendant:
Sentry Electrical Group, Inc. and Derek James Bellinger
Plaintiff:
Dennis Fenty and Venancia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rodriguez v. Sentry Electrical Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00755
Defendant:
Sentry Electrical Group, Inc. and Derek James Bellinger
Plaintiff:
Venancia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rodriguez v. Bellinger et al
as 2:2024cv00754
Defendant:
Derek Bellinger and Sentry Electrical Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Venancia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bellinger v. THE CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2024cv08442
Defendant:
PO JESSICA DEJESUS, THE CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, DET. BENJAMIN BATISTA and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Curtis Bellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Russell v. Wilcoxen, et al.
as 24-4664
Defendant:
CHACON, C/O WILCOXEN, GARRETT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMELLE L. RUSSELL
King v. Bellinger
as 0:2024cv02432
Defendant:
Bellinger
Plaintiff:
Arron King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Bellinger
as 24-1844
Plaintiff:
GREGORY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
MARTHA BELLINGER, in her capacity as the Temporary Judge pursuant to Article VI 21 of the California Constitution,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
