Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HOPKINS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11155
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BERNARD HOPKINS JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Anthony Hopkins, Jr.
as 22-4641
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY BERNARD HOPKINS, JR., a/k/a Tony Cash
Hopkins v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2017cv00115
Petitioner:
Shelton Bernard Hopkins, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Golden Boy Promotions, LLC, et al v. Alan Haymon, et al
as 17-55259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GOLDEN BOY PROMOTIONS, LLC, BERNARD HOPKINS and GOLDEN BOY PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN HAYMON, ALAN HAYMON DEVELOPMENT, INC., HAYMON SPORTS, LLC and others
Golden Boy Promotions LLC et al v. Alan Haymon et al
as 2:2015cv03378
Defendant:
Alan Haymon Development, Inc., Ryan Caldwell, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Golden Boy Promotions LLC and Bernard Hopkins
HOPKINS et al v. SKINNER et al
as 2:2013cv03379
Plaintiff:
BERNARD HOPKINS, JR. , ADELE M. HOPKINS and SHERIA HOPKINS
Defendant:
KYLE J. SKINNER and BARBARA M. SKINNER
Cross_claimant:
BARBARA M. SKINNER and KYLE J. SKINNER
Cross_defendant:
BERNARD HOPKINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
USA v. Shelton Hopkins, Jr.
as 12-50595
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHELTON BERNARD HOPKINS, JR.
FISHER v. HOPKINS
as 2:2009cv04236
Plaintiff:
ENGLISH BOUIE FISHER
Defendant:
BERNARD HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Riches v. Hopkins et al
as 7:2008cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Bernard Hopkins and Joe Calzaghe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
