Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Allen et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2019cv11837
Defendant:
Charles Jamsen, Bhamini Sudhir, Kristi Goehmann and others
Plaintiff:
Brandee Patrick, Terry Davis, Danisha Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Boulding v. Bhamini Sudhir, et al
as 16-2733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JUNIUS BOULDING
Defendant - Appellee:
BHAMINI SUDHIR, Q CORIZON HEALTH, INC., DR. STEVEN BERGMAN and others
Steve Odom v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 15-2254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., JEFFREY C. STIEVE, MD, WILLIAM BORGERDING, MD and others
Boulding v. Sudhir et al
as 2:2015cv12706
Plaintiff:
Timothy Boulding
Defendant:
Bhamini Sudhir, Corizon Health, Inc., Steven Bergman and others
Michael Robbins v. John Payne, et al
as 14-2395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ROBBINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PAYNE, Physician's Assistant, JEFFREY C. STIEVE, Medical Doctor, BHAMINI SUDHIR, Medical Doctor and others
Odom #161794 v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00606
Plaintiff:
Steven Odom #161794
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Jeffry C. Stieve, William Borgerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. Department of Corrections, State of Michigan et al
as 2:2014cv11130
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vinson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of Michigan , Corizon Corporation , Richard Miles, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boulding v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14325
Plaintiff:
Timothy Boulding
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Steven Bergman and Bhamini Sudhir
Miller v. Albercook et al
as 2:2011cv15309
Plaintiff:
Jason Miller
Defendant:
Caren Albercook, Prison Health Services, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Robbins v. Payne et al
as 2:2011cv15140
Plaintiff:
Michael Robbins
Defendant:
John Payne, Jeffrey C Stieve, Bhamini Sudhir and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
