Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Sanders v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02304
Petitioner:
Bill Adam Sanders
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Taylor v. Bill Adams, et al
as 13-6163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL ADAMS, Jailer and MCCRACKEN COUNTY, KENTUCKY
Defendant:
MCCRACKEN COUNTY JAIL
Adams v. Davis County et al
as 1:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Bill Adams
Defendant:
Davis County and Davis County Towing Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
ADAMS v. CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA et al
as 3:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
BILL ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA , CHIP SIMMONS and R EAGERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2012cv00423
Petitioner:
Bill Adam Sanders
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Lindensmith v. Melissa Jerome, et al
as 12-1036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LINDENSMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA JEROME, Mailroom Supervisor, BILLY RAY THOMPSON, Chaplain, WAYNE DEVERNEY, Facility Manager and others
Taylor v. Adams et al
as 5:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Taylor
Defendant:
Bill Adams, McCracken County Jail and McCracken County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Port of Port Arthur Navigation v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Port of Port Arthur Navigation
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company , McLarens Young International, Inc. , Bill Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lindensmith v. Jerome et al
as 2:2010cv13616
Plaintiff:
David Lindensmith
Defendant:
Melissa Jerome, Billy Ray Thompson, Wayne Deverney and others
Lindensmith v. Jerone et al
as 2:2010cv13530
Plaintiff:
David Lindensmith
Defendant:
Melissa Jerome, Billy Ray Thompson, Wayne Deverney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
