Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Adams v. Pearl River Valley Water
as 21-60749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Quincy Adams, on behalf of themselves and all others situated and Alean Adams, on behalf of themselves and all others situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Pearl River Valley Water Supply District, Jennifer Hall, Ben Evans and others
HENSELMEIER v. BILLY COOK HARNESS & SADDLE MANUFACTURING, INC.
as 1:2021cv00794
Defendant:
BILLY COOK HARNESS & SADDLE MANUFACTURING, INC.
Plaintiff:
LARRY HENSELMEIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Adams et al v. Pearl River Valley Water Supply District
as 3:2020cv00469
Plaintiff:
John Quincy Adams and Alean Adams
Defendant:
Pearl River Valley Water Supply District, Ben Evans, Jack Winstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07557
Plaintiff:
Billy Cook
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Billy Cook v. Mike Parri
as 17-5155
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY COOK
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE PARRIS
Danielle Dexter v. Kristy West, et al
as 17-5124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIELLE DEVON DEXTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTY K WEST, CRAIG L JOHNSON and BILLY COOK
Dexter v. West et al
as 1:2016cv00467
Plaintiff:
Danielle Devon Dexter
Defendant:
Kristy K West, Craig L Johnson and Billy Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. Decatur Municipal Court et al
as 5:2016cv01795
Plaintiff:
Coary L Goode
Defendant:
Decatur Municipal Court, Billy Cook, Decatur City Municipal Magistrate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dexter v. West et al
as 1:2016mc00048
Plaintiff:
Danielle Devon Dexter
Defendant:
Kristy K West, Craig L Johnson and Billy Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Cook
as 3:2016cv01850
Petitioner:
Billy Cook
Respondent:
Doug Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
