Cases 11 - 20 of 22
John Doe #1 v. Roy Cooper, III
as 16-6026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, #1, JOHN DOE, #2, JOHN DOE, #3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROY A. COOPER, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, FRANK PARRISH, District Attorney, District 01, SETH EDWARDS, District Attorney, District 02 and others
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, Governor of the State of North Carolina
Owens et al v. Butler et al
as 5:2015ct03059
Plaintiff:
Tommy Owens, Tyrone D. Evans, Derek K. McKoy and others
Defendant:
Earl R. Butler, Nat Robinson and Billy West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunson v. Obama et al
as 5:2014ct03291
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eugene Brunson
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Pat McCrory, E. Lynn Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Condlin et al
as 5:2014cv00615
Plaintiff:
Tommy Owens
Defendant:
Bernard Condlin, Billy West, Earl M. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gretchen Stuart v. Paul Camnitz
as 14-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD
Sylvester Harding, III v. R. Roush
as 13-7390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER E. HARDING, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN R. ROUSH, LIEUTENANT D. BULLARD, CLAYTON RICHARD, U. S. Supreme Court and others
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding v. Roush et al
as 5:2012ct03136
Plaintiff:
Sylvester E. Harding, III
Defendant:
R. Roush, D. Bullard, Clayton Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD, GREGORY J. BRANNON, MD, CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D., in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., M.D., GREGORY J. BRANNON, M.D., CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.