Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3457
Plaintiff - Appellant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, as Administrator of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota Pension Equity Plan, Supplemental Benefit Committee of the International Truck and Engine Corp. Retiree Supplemental Benefit Trust, as Administrator of the International Truck and Engine Corp. Retiree Supplemental Benefit Trust, Meijer, Inc., as Administrator of the Meijer OMP Pension Plan and Meijer Hourly Pension Plan, Participants in the Meijer Master Pension Trust and others
Plaintiff: CentraCare Health System, on Behalf of Itself and the Sisters of the Order of Saint Benedict Retirement Plan, Jerome Foundation, North Memorial Health Care, on Behalf of Itself and as Administrator of the North Memorial Health Care Pension Plan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Aton Center, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota et al
as 3:2014cv01667
Plaintiff: Aton Center, Inc.
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota , Casey Riddle and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 11-1904
Plaintiff: PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant: GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF NORTHWEST and others
Petitioner: RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Not Classified By Court: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Defendant / Appellant: WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC., SUSAN DUDLEY and others
Amicus Curiae: PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv04663
Plaintiff: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION , AETNA, INC. , AMERIGROUP/HMS and others
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Oklahoma Spine Hospital v. Health Care Service Corporation et al
as 5:2013cv00696
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Spine Hospital
Defendant: Health Care Service Corporation and Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gran et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota Inc
as 0:2013cv00989
Plaintiff: Michele Gran and Nicholas Philbrook
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota Inc.
LIFEWATCH SERVICES, INC. v. HIGHMARK, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00598
Plaintiff: LIFEWATCH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: Highmark, Inc. , Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association , Wellpoint, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota v. Hyman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv00530
Plaintiff: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota
Defendant: Sally Laura Hyman, Robert M Ginsberg and Ginsberg & Wolf, P.C.
Counter_claimant: Ginsberg & Wolf, P.C., Robert M Ginsberg and Sally Laura Hyman
Counter_defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota
LIFEWATCH SERVICES, INC. v. HIGHMARK, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05146
Plaintiff: LIFEWATCH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: HIGHMARK, INC., BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, WELLPOINT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Harper-Hutzel Hospital v. Black We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv12571
Plaintiff: Harper-Hutzel Hospital
Defendant: Karen Black
Thirdparty_defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota and Archway Marketing Services, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Karen Black
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?