Cases 1 - 10 of 983
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund for Home Care Workers and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10565
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Richard Sprague v. Sanofi S.A., et al
as 21-10306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD SPRAGUE, individually and as representative of the estate of Brenda Sprague and MARILYN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI S.A. and others
Max Ridings, et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim, et al
as 20-1824
Defendant / Appellee:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim (USA) Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Defendant:
Matthew Hoesch, Scott Maurice, Jennifer Caskey and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sue Ridings and Max Ridings
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
People of The State of California v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00923
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WARREN et al v. BOEHRING INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GmbH et al
as INS/1:16-cv-01326
Plaintiff:
TANYA WARREN and LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGLEHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH , ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Darbro et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as KYE/0:16-cv-00057
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Darbro and Jerry Gibson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG , Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and others
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma Gmbh & Co. Kg et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 3:2016mc80196
Movant:
Wendy A. Petka
Plaintiff:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma Gmbh & Co. Kg, Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, et al
as 3:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
