Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Ederer v. HomeStreet, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02748
Plaintiff:
Marsha Ederer
Defendant:
HomeStreet, Inc., Mark K. Mason, James R. Mitchell, Jr. and others
Boggs v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dustin Boggs
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Boggs v. Federal Reserve Bank
as 1:2024cv10280
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Associated General Contractors of America Inc et al v. Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Associated General Contractors of America Inc, Louisiana Associated General Contractors Inc, Lincoln Builders Inc and others
Defendant:
Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, Jeffrey A Koses, Joseph R Biden, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Smith v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Jones v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
US v. Richard Boggs
as 23-4445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD E. BOGGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
