Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Arthur Acevedo v. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02625
Plaintiff:
Arthur Acevedo
Defendant:
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Boot Barn, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Coleman v. Patel et al
as 1:2020cv00925
Defendant:
Euclid Donuts, Inc., Nilaykumar Patel, Bhavani Donuts, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tori Coleman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Curry v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paula Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Trahan v. Walgreen Co., et al.
as 2:2018cv02688
Undetermined:
Jimmy Moore
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff:
Cherri K. Trahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2018at01474
Defendant:
Blue Company, Walgreen Co., Walgreen Boots Alliance aka WBA and others
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodman v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2018cv02515
Defendant:
Blue Company, Walgreen Co., Red Top Company and others
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcie Le v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 8:2018cv01548
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, Does 1-50, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Marcie Le and Karen Dao
Special Master:
Jay C Gandhi
Other:
Christina Epstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reynoso v. Westville Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03431
Plaintiff:
Juan Reynoso
Defendant:
Westville Restaurant, Inc., Hurricane Strauss, Inc., Jay's Nickels and Dimes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boots v. Kona Sushi, Inc.
as 0:2017cv03401
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Boots
Defendant:
Kona Sushi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Galeb v. Advanced Booting Services Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04799
Plaintiff:
Hisham Galeb
Defendant:
Advanced Booting Services Inc., Jeffrey Phillips and Michael Jacob
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
