Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Bowell v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-4314
Respondent: JAMES HILL, MARCUS POLLARD and A. LAMARQUE, WARDEN
Petitioner: JAMES EDWARD BOWELL
Bowell v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner: James Bowell
Respondent: James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowell v. Hill
as 24-2134
Petitioner: JAMES BOWELL
Respondent: JAMES HILL
Bowell v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-42
Petitioner: JAMES BOWELL
Respondent: MARCUS POLLARD, JAMES HILL and A. LAMARQUE, WARDEN
NELSON v. BOWELS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00326
Plaintiff: JOEY L NELSON
Defendant: BOWELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowell v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego
as 23-4026
Petitioner: JAMES BOWELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Not Classified By Court: MARCUS POLLARD, JAMES HILL and A. LAMARQUE, WARDEN
Ezekiel Cox v. Dr. Iqbal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-7131
Plaintiff / Appellant: EZEKIEL J. COX
Defendant / Appellee: DR. IQBAL, LARRY EDMONDS, Warden, BOWELS, Assistant Warden and others
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. et al v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff: The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. and Terence J. Sweeney
Defendant: Richard Neville, Walker H. Bramlett, Pamela D. Bowels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ezekiel Cox v. Dr. Nwaokoha We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-6858
Plaintiff / Appellant: EZEKIEL J. COX
Defendant / Appellee: DR. NWAOKOHA, LARRY EDMONDS, Warden, BOWELS, Assistant Warden and others
Bowell v. Pollard
as 23-317
Petitioner: JAMES BOWELL
Respondent: JAMES HILL, WARDEN and MARCUS POLLARD, WARDEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?