Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Antar v. Lodice et al
as 3:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice, Scott Lodice, Karen Bowers and others
Amicus Curiae:
Esq Lizelle Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Trump et al
as 2:2018cv10133
Defendant:
Stephen A. Smith, Ryan Friedlinghaus, Mario Lemieux and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome S. Adams
Radial Engines Ltd v. Waco Classic Aircraft Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Radial Engines Ltd
Defendant:
Waco Classic Aircraft Corporation and Peter Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Bower v. Tabitha Julian, et al
as 15-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary R. Bower
Defendant - Appellee:
Tabitha Reade Julian, Nicole Schrock and Kenna McClellan
Bower v. Julian et al
as 6:2014cv03457
Plaintiff:
Mary R. Bower
Defendant:
Tabitha Read Julian, Nicole Schrock and Kenna McClellan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Georkeshia Denise Campbell v. Lee Baca et al
as 2:2012cv07091
Defendant:
Alcoholic Anonymous Central Offices, Antelope Valley Courthouse, Michael D. Antonovich and others
Plaintiff:
Georkeshia Denise Campbell
BOWER v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2011cv00931
Plaintiff:
EILEEN A. BOWER
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES , EVA LIGHTEL and JAMESON HEALTH SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Utah Association of Realtors et al
as 2:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bates
Defendant:
Utah Association of Realtors , Christopher Kyler , Mark Steinegal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reardon-Reeves et al v. Bowers et al
as 4:2010cv04055
Plaintiff:
Nina Reardon-Reeves and J. Scott Yaruss
Defendant:
Linda V Bowers and LinguiSystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bower v. Schepers
as 6:2007cv03318
Plaintiff:
Mary R. Bower
Defendant:
Daniel Schepers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
